It has been a busy six weeks. I have several drafts that I have been working on, but just not enough time to complete and post. I am glad that I do not have time to post, as I own my own businesses, and would rather burn the extra oil for the delicious cheese at the end of the maze than to miss out.
However....
I studied the Greenhouse Effect back in the early 1990's. I spent a lot of time studying physics and chemistry of the atmosphere, but was not enough of a radical politician to get the right ideas. For some reason, I guess I learned that the laws of physics are conservative and cannot be changed, applying to the scale of the problem, I just cannot accept a "leap of faith" belief to accept a theory or model when there is no real meat or equations to explain the model or theory.
Anyway, I left with the knowledge that somehow the fiery yellow ball in the sky somehow causes more to our lives than a miniscule change of one molecule in 10,000. A molecule that has much more to do with the life cycle of humans than the cycle of the atmosphere.
My reason? Here
Of course, there is definitely some GreenTard spin to the article, where the attempt to undermine the news with a ridiculous claim towards the end of the article in one, stupid sentance:
"The solar cycle does not have as great an effect on Earth's climate as the El Nino cycle."
Oh really? What drives the El Nino effect, jackasses?
Thanks space.com. Your attempt to report as an unbiased group shows your savvy.
Friday, August 28, 2009
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Prediction: Libtards Rejoice on Saving Planet
I was reading this earlier today that was a link from this, but did not get a chance to post until now. Some of us actually work for a living and cannot hang out all day long in their parents basement like all the Libtards do while mom is working.
Anyhoo, since Fraud Failure Al Franken is now No. 60 in the Senate, I am sure that this complete failure of a plan will pass.
Even though the bright yellow ball of fire in the sky has been silent, magnetospherically speaking, and that lack of this chaotic field actually provides a calming effect to the out magnetosphere of this blue marble, which in turn has less charged dynamics affecting things like weather, etc., these fools will still pass the Cap and Taxxxxx.
Then, of course the minute this smoldering pile of feces lands on the President's lap for signature, you will see these vapid loons shrilling with joy echoing in a bizarre glossolalia about how the minute Barack's pen touched the bill to ink the final death knell to this economy, the atmosphere cooled, the Arctic icecaps stopped melting, the seas stopped rising, and all is joy joy joy.
Watch.
I am totally serious.
Copyright 2009, Adoptadaptimprove
Anyhoo, since Fraud Failure Al Franken is now No. 60 in the Senate, I am sure that this complete failure of a plan will pass.
Even though the bright yellow ball of fire in the sky has been silent, magnetospherically speaking, and that lack of this chaotic field actually provides a calming effect to the out magnetosphere of this blue marble, which in turn has less charged dynamics affecting things like weather, etc., these fools will still pass the Cap and Taxxxxx.
Then, of course the minute this smoldering pile of feces lands on the President's lap for signature, you will see these vapid loons shrilling with joy echoing in a bizarre glossolalia about how the minute Barack's pen touched the bill to ink the final death knell to this economy, the atmosphere cooled, the Arctic icecaps stopped melting, the seas stopped rising, and all is joy joy joy.
Watch.
I am totally serious.
Copyright 2009, Adoptadaptimprove
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Stupid Theory: Wind is Dying Due to Global Warming
This is a joke, right? I saw this on Jammiewearingfool.
Background:
First, I hardly doubt many in the press, media, government, public even understand any of these arguments on energy and/or the environment. This is complex, not above anyone's heads if they read up on the subject and attempt to understand the scales of magnitude and requirements ahead. I will only use simple models as these will use current, published data, publicly known and simplistically projected over time. Projections over time are pretty much worthless in my experience in technical marketing as you cannot predict paradigm shifts or major upsets, but still I will apply it here for argument.
Secondly, pinwheels are not going to make our country energy independent regardless the speeches, commercials, or a public reach-around performed by Hollywood and the elite. They are not going to do much, even if the amount of these glittery whirlybirds triples every four years for the next 20 years, there are going to be problems.
Taking this data set and plotting the energy produced by pinwheels from 2003 to 2007 (Notice Solar/PV? Pathetic) shows a modest growth, even tripling of the net production over the four years that evil Bush and Darth Cheney were in office. I guess it should have been more intense according to the tin hat environmentals.
So, looking at this growth over time up to 2027, using a simple linear relationship and the formula shown, the estimated net electrical output for pinwheels is ~150 X 10^9 kW hr. Note, this is kW hr [NOTE:DOE and IEA provide some misleading slights of hand in the data publishing. Watch for BTU, kWhr, and thousands of kWhr].
Using the conversion of:
Yields:
For the entire estimated output of electrical energy by the pinwheels over the entire course of 2027. This is still a longshot as my linear curve, projected over 20 years does not account for the following:
1. World War III
2. Civil War in the US
3. Epiphany that Pinwheels are pure charlatanry
4. The gargantuan amount of real estate taken to house all of these things
5. Realization that the electrical grid, etc will cost too fucking much
6. Nukes overtake all with fast breeders, new designs
7. The first Tokomak goes online
8. Alien invasion
9. Armageddon (topics not covered in items 1, 2, and 8)
10. ?
Still, at this amount, it is still 0.035% of the TOTAL ENERGY PRODUCED in the US in 2007. And I did not account for growth in energy demand. Which can vary, but is steady. More people, more houses, more cars, more capitol goods, more juice required to drive the economy. The EIA and DOE show a relativeley misleading pie chart on this screen. Not to mention that there are a lot of fine details that fluctuate between BTU, kWhr, MWhr, and Thousands of kWhr.
Of course, you will say, "Hey, like you are comparing, like, organic soybeans to some sort of, like, synthetic orange-flavored petrochemical-industrial-complex juice box. Wind power is righteous and actually accounts for, like, a lot of Cali's power, dude."
True, I am singling out pinwheel power and comparing it to the entire energy smorgasbord, however, when the Kewl Aid drinking Libtards pontificate about renewable energy powering all the plug-in tincan cars poorly manufactured by the bloated Michael Moore-like UAW, where will that other replacement energy supply come from?
Hypothesis:
My greatest concern with the pinwheel insanity bandwagon stems from item 4 above: the amount of land required to house all of these pinwheels. This is not because I am some NIMBY. It is more that all the energy robbed from these low wind patterns will effectively change/transform the landscape.
Discussion:
This might not sound like much since by 2027 this will only amount to <0.035% of the US total energy usage, however, the distribution of the power generation stations are targeted towards areas of high wind patterns. These regions would act as small perturbations to the grand systematic patterns of the current atmosphere. [I say current as there is no baseline or zero reference point, unless of course you are one of those Algores].
Since each of these regions will remove kinetic energy from these weather systems (regardless of the state of the weather), there will be an end effect on the weather as a whole.
I have asked this question of resultant weather changes from the effects of large pinwheel farms to the green nuts, pinwheel people, etc. I have not received an answer yet.
Now of course the reason being is that no one fucking knows squat about this as they are trying to make some of their own green from this visual nuisance, but I would differ. This might be as bad as all the ancestors of these green freaks addressing the smog resulting from oil production and gasoline use. This was easy: change fuel formulations, improve vehicle efficiency, improve refinement.
No, my concern now is that 20-30 years in the future, we do find out that there are effects from these hideous low frequency noise makers, and as a result of cutting nukes, fusion, oil, coal, etc. from our tool chest of opportunities, we find that we were fooled by people who are no longer around. They cashed their green in before heading to greener pastures.
Background:
First, I hardly doubt many in the press, media, government, public even understand any of these arguments on energy and/or the environment. This is complex, not above anyone's heads if they read up on the subject and attempt to understand the scales of magnitude and requirements ahead. I will only use simple models as these will use current, published data, publicly known and simplistically projected over time. Projections over time are pretty much worthless in my experience in technical marketing as you cannot predict paradigm shifts or major upsets, but still I will apply it here for argument.
Secondly, pinwheels are not going to make our country energy independent regardless the speeches, commercials, or a public reach-around performed by Hollywood and the elite. They are not going to do much, even if the amount of these glittery whirlybirds triples every four years for the next 20 years, there are going to be problems.
Taking this data set and plotting the energy produced by pinwheels from 2003 to 2007 (Notice Solar/PV? Pathetic) shows a modest growth, even tripling of the net production over the four years that evil Bush and Darth Cheney were in office. I guess it should have been more intense according to the tin hat environmentals.
So, looking at this growth over time up to 2027, using a simple linear relationship and the formula shown, the estimated net electrical output for pinwheels is ~150 X 10^9 kW hr. Note, this is kW hr [NOTE:DOE and IEA provide some misleading slights of hand in the data publishing. Watch for BTU, kWhr, and thousands of kWhr].
Using the conversion of:
Yields:
For the entire estimated output of electrical energy by the pinwheels over the entire course of 2027. This is still a longshot as my linear curve, projected over 20 years does not account for the following:
1. World War III
2. Civil War in the US
3. Epiphany that Pinwheels are pure charlatanry
4. The gargantuan amount of real estate taken to house all of these things
5. Realization that the electrical grid, etc will cost too fucking much
6. Nukes overtake all with fast breeders, new designs
7. The first Tokomak goes online
8. Alien invasion
9. Armageddon (topics not covered in items 1, 2, and 8)
10. ?
Still, at this amount, it is still 0.035% of the TOTAL ENERGY PRODUCED in the US in 2007. And I did not account for growth in energy demand. Which can vary, but is steady. More people, more houses, more cars, more capitol goods, more juice required to drive the economy. The EIA and DOE show a relativeley misleading pie chart on this screen. Not to mention that there are a lot of fine details that fluctuate between BTU, kWhr, MWhr, and Thousands of kWhr.
Of course, you will say, "Hey, like you are comparing, like, organic soybeans to some sort of, like, synthetic orange-flavored petrochemical-industrial-complex juice box. Wind power is righteous and actually accounts for, like, a lot of Cali's power, dude."
True, I am singling out pinwheel power and comparing it to the entire energy smorgasbord, however, when the Kewl Aid drinking Libtards pontificate about renewable energy powering all the plug-in tincan cars poorly manufactured by the bloated Michael Moore-like UAW, where will that other replacement energy supply come from?
Hypothesis:
My greatest concern with the pinwheel insanity bandwagon stems from item 4 above: the amount of land required to house all of these pinwheels. This is not because I am some NIMBY. It is more that all the energy robbed from these low wind patterns will effectively change/transform the landscape.
Discussion:
This might not sound like much since by 2027 this will only amount to <0.035% of the US total energy usage, however, the distribution of the power generation stations are targeted towards areas of high wind patterns. These regions would act as small perturbations to the grand systematic patterns of the current atmosphere. [I say current as there is no baseline or zero reference point, unless of course you are one of those Algores].
Since each of these regions will remove kinetic energy from these weather systems (regardless of the state of the weather), there will be an end effect on the weather as a whole.
I have asked this question of resultant weather changes from the effects of large pinwheel farms to the green nuts, pinwheel people, etc. I have not received an answer yet.
Now of course the reason being is that no one fucking knows squat about this as they are trying to make some of their own green from this visual nuisance, but I would differ. This might be as bad as all the ancestors of these green freaks addressing the smog resulting from oil production and gasoline use. This was easy: change fuel formulations, improve vehicle efficiency, improve refinement.
No, my concern now is that 20-30 years in the future, we do find out that there are effects from these hideous low frequency noise makers, and as a result of cutting nukes, fusion, oil, coal, etc. from our tool chest of opportunities, we find that we were fooled by people who are no longer around. They cashed their green in before heading to greener pastures.
Monday, June 1, 2009
WTF!?!
I saw this one on YouTube.
Just think of what will happen when the CPU processor bypasses human brain processing in 2012*. Especially when the Internet becomes self aware and deems humans an unnecessary nuisance for filling all of its bandwidth up with porn, twitter, and chat.
Not too long before T-100's will be rolling the streets.
*: This date may or may not be valid. I was going from memory. I will find it and fix this.
Just think of what will happen when the CPU processor bypasses human brain processing in 2012*. Especially when the Internet becomes self aware and deems humans an unnecessary nuisance for filling all of its bandwidth up with porn, twitter, and chat.
Not too long before T-100's will be rolling the streets.
*: This date may or may not be valid. I was going from memory. I will find it and fix this.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)